Forum switch to English language keinen Seitencache mehr benutzen Infospalte auf der rechten Seite ausblenden auf das dynamische Seitenlayout wechseln keine Wikipediabegriffe automatisch verlinken keine Begriffe automatisch verlinken
|
Intensity [BF] am 13.03.2004, 22:37
|
|
I write this just to clarify a news message which has been posted on LegendaryTimes about the theory regarding Nazca, but I of course hope to start of a discussion. Do you think differently about Nazca? Do you have other ideas, a (partially) new look at the mystery? Please tell us! The part of the news message I'm referring to is the following : (Erich von Däniken, by the way, never said the Nazca lines HAD BEEN an ancient airport... he only wrote they are looking LIKE landing strips. In his opinion Nazca was a gigantic example of an ancient "Cargo Cult"...) So what ís the Nazca theory? Now what exactly would the people who made the Nazca lines be imitating? It's a bit hard to explain without visuals, in my humble opinion someone high up in the organisation really needs to get some money for hiring a graphic designer for this kind of thing...Okay, so here goes : Try imagining an airplane landing in the middle of a desert. The landing of the aircraft will logically leave a rough triangle... Flashback... We're back in time, a few thousand years ago... A rather uncivilized tribe - compared to what they're about to meet - sees how the heavens light up, the people are amazed and scared...a giant 'monster' lands with a terrible noise and fire. But alas...before the men dare to approach their 'Gods' the 'Gods' already leave...their 'monster' makes a terrible noise and causes fire all around when it takes off. The people want the Gods to return, and after carefully examining the area where the monster stood they find it left traces in the sand : a large triangle. Back in our time... This theory could be examined in a large number of ways : - Are there any more traces of ancient astronauts? More specific : - Are the triangles and lines the oldest? (With the more complex drawings being made later on when the simple ones appearantly did not caught the attention of the Gods - or perhaps the 'prettier' drawings were made to ensure the Gods would land on théir triangles and not on the ones of another tribe) Of course, the triangles and lines being the oldest would not proove much - as they are the simplest they are likely to be the oldest anyway, but if prooven otherwise it may proove the above stated theory is wrong. I suggest... |
|
|
Intensity [BF] am 13.03.2004, 22:42
|
|
A few images... An airport? www.freehomepages.com Landing sites? lsinzelle.free.fr Signs for who? www.throckmorton-nyc.com  ; Also see : Däniken, E. von (1997), "Tekens voor de eeuwigheid : de boodschap van Nazca" (Dutch title), Amsterdam : Luitingh-Sijthoff |
|
|
Nicht registriert
54 Beiträge |
I think Naca is a place in witch a group of people folow a kargo cult like many after them and before them. I think you are to fixed on Erich von Däniken so you can´t make your own teoris verly clear. I have my owen teori abaut zhis thema i have wirte a referat abaut them a mybe put it online next time. My class in school like it. |
|
Intensity [BF] am 15.03.2004, 22:00
|
|
|
|
Yes...Nazca is the result of a cargo cultus, that is exactly what Erich von Däniken proposes and what I explained in the above message. I'd really like to see the stuff you wrote, what is the difference with Erich's theories? What you just said is similar... |
|
Nicht registriert
54 Beiträge |
I try to find a webside to put it online. |
|
Intensity [BF] am 21.03.2004, 14:51
|
|
|
|
Okay |

